Effect of Whole Purple Potato Flour on Dough Properties and Quality of Steamed Bread
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WPPF was added into the wheat flour (WF) flour with different addition amount (0%~50%) to study the influence of whole purple potato flour (WPPF) on dough properties and quality of steamed bread. Result revealed that the WPPF addition significantly influenced the dough properties and quality of steamed bread. The water absorption, the maximum height of the gas release, total volume of CO2 release and the hardness of steamed bread significantly increased with the increase of WPPF addition amount, while decreased the dough stability, the maximum height of dough, the gas holding capacity and the specific volume. Moreover, peak viscosity, final viscosity and setback value had a remarkable decrease when 10% WPPF added, but increased following the addition of WPPF. Considering the sensory evaluation, the steamed bread with 20% WPPF is acceptable. Appropriate addition amount of WPPF improves the nutrition value and variety of steamed bread and did not effect on the quality of the quality of dough and steamed bread.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".