Experimental Investigation on the Thermal Performance of a Heat Pipe-based Cooling System
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An experimental study is carried out in order to determine the thermal performances of a water-cooled heat pipe cooling system. An experiment rig is designed, fabricated and fully instrumented to test the cooling system prototype. The results show that the maximum heat transport capacity of the heat pipe increase with the water-cooling temperature; however, its overall thermal resistance decreases. Correlations for heat transfer in the evaporator and condenser sections are proposed. A model is also developed in order to determine the capillary limit as well as the heat transfer in the heat pipe. The model can predict the experimental results within -1.7 % and +7.9 % when estimating the capillary limit and underestimates the heat pipe overall thermal resistance within -17.8 % and -9.7 %; however, it overestimates the evaporator temperature within 4.4 % and 9.5 %.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it