MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954047469

Contributos do lazer desportivo outdoor na criação de novos campos de pensar e agir = Contribution of outdoor activities in the creation of new fields of thinking and acting

2018· article· en· W2954047469 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alcides Vieira Costa, Maria Altina Almeida, Carlos Colaço, Alberto Reinaldo Reppold Filho

Bibliographic record

VenueService social · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAdventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceGeographyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O desenvolvimento do lazer desportivo outdoor e um tema que vem sendo discutido ha muitos anos por diversos setores da sociedade. Estas atividades podem ser importantes catalisadores do desenvolvimento social e da recuperacao de regioes debilitadas do ponto de vista social, economico, demografico e ambiental. O presente estudo tem por objetivo estabelecer os contributos do lazer desportivo outdoor na criacao de novos campos de pensar e agir, a partir da analise dos beneficios sociais, economicos, para os praticantes e para o ambiente. A pesquisa foi exploratoria de indole qualitativa que triangulou informacoes de documentos, entrevistas semiestruturadas e observacoes. Os documentos consistiram de diretrizes, programas e planos sobre as caracteristicas geograficas e socioambientais dos locais de pratica na cidade de Porto Alegre, Brasil. As entrevistas, num total de 29, foram realizadas com representantes do poder publico, de federacoes desportivas, de organizacoes nao-governamentais, de docentes de instituicoes de ensino superior, de empresarios do setor e instrutores de desporto e turismo de aventura. As observacoes, num total de 8, aconteceram em regioes com caracteristicas geograficas com potencial para a pratica destas atividades. Os resultados evidenciam que os contributos do lazer desportivo outdoor, devido a sua transversalidade, sao catalizadores de novos campos para pensar e agir, provocando um impacto positivo ao nivel social, economico e ambiental nas regioes onde estas atividades sao desenvolvidas de forma sustentavel. The development of outdoor activities is a topic that has been discussed by many sectors of society over the years. These activities can be important catalysts for the social development and recovery of regions weakened from the social, economic, demographic and environmental point of view. This study aims to establish the contributions brought by outdoor activities to the creation of new ways of thinking and acting, based on the analysis of social and economic benefits, for practitioners and for the environment. The research was an exploratory study in a qualitative approach that analyzed information from interviews, documents and observations. The documents consisted of guidelines, programs and plans on the geographical and socio-environmental characteristics of the practice sites in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil. The interviews, in a total of 29, were held with representatives of government, sports federations, NGOs, lecturers of higher education institutions, entrepreneurs and outdoor activities instructors. The observations, 8 altogether, occurred in regions with geographical features that allow the practice of such activities. The results showed that the contributions of outdoor activities are important catalysts for new thinking and acting perspectives, having a social, economic and environmental positive impact in the regions where these activities are developed in a sustainable way. Palavras-chave / Keywords: Lazer desportivo outdoor, Contributos, Social, Economico, Ambiental. Outdoor activities, Social, Economic, Environmental, Contributions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueService socialSame topicAdventure Sports and Sensation SeekingFrench-language works237,207