MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954066018 · doi:10.2316/j.2019.206-0233

COGNITIVE RADIO RESOURCE ALLOCATION BASED ON THE IMPROVED QUANTUM GENETIC ALGORITHM

2019· article· en· W2954066018 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bin Han, Hong Jiang, Ying Luo, Jinzhi Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCognitive radioComputer scienceGenetic algorithmResource allocationQuantumCognitionAlgorithmComputer networkDistributed computingPsychologyMachine learningTelecommunicationsNeuroscienceWirelessPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the spectrum allocation of cognitive radio (CR) network, the problems of local optimum and premature convergence remain challenging.To further improve the efficiency of the spectrum allocation, this paper proposes a novel method based on an improved quantum genetic algorithm.This is an algorithm that is designed to dynamically adjust the quantum rotation angle to speed up the convergence rate.In particular, the variation threshold was introduced to the mutation operation on chromosomes, establishing new interference constraint rules in the process of spectrum allocation.The simulation work was implemented for validation, and the results revealed that the proposed methodology achieved better average benefits of the CR network for a reasonable allocation of the spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robotics and AutomationSame topicSatellite Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207