Experiências de microurbanismo: novos olhares sobre a gestão do solo urbano
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A crise generalizada de representatividade política é um fenômeno ligado a uma transformação estrutural na sociedade contemporânea. O “microurbanismo” como política pública participativa vai além da consulta a população sobre suas realidades sociais e urbanas, e confere ao indivíduo o poder criativo de projeto. Por meio de seu potencial transformador, uma sociedade marginalizada e excluída pode se converter em uma democracia plena (participativa e inclusiva). O objetivo geral deste trabalho é discutir políticas públicas em habitação relacionadas a gestão do solo urbano participativa, comparando estudos de caso em Québec/CA e São Paulo/BR. Vislumbra-se uma relação entre os programas de fomento de cooperativas de habitação, a renda e a densidade demográfica em Montreal, enquanto que, na situação brasileira de urbanização recente, intensa e desorganizada, é possível indentificar características semelhantes. As políticas públicas de ambos os casos estão inscritas em dinâmicas urbanas ditadas pela forte especulação, que impele coletividades à exclusão socioespacial. The widespread crisis of political representativeness is a phenomenon linked to a structural transformation in contemporary society. “Microurbanism” as a participatory public policy goes beyond consulting the population about its social and urban issues, and promotes the individual the creative power to design. Through its transforming potential, a marginalized and excluded colective may become a full democracy (participatory and inclusive). The general objective of this work is to discuss public housing policies related to participatory urban land management, comparing case studies in Québec / CA and São Paulo / BR. The relationship between housing development programs, income and population density in Montreal is noticeable, while in the Brazilian situation of recent intense and disorganized urbanization, similar characteristics are also apparent. The public policies of both cases are inscribed in urban dynamics dictated by strong speculation, which impels collectivities to social and spatial exclusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".