Politique du son et des sentiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article traite de questions liées à la représentation et à l’expression du soi dans une communauté inuit du Labrador en se basant sur trois chansons de style country composées localement et fréquemment demandées et diffusées sur les ondes de la radio communautaire. La motivation politique, insuffisamment mise en valeur, sous-jacente aux « structures de sentiment » de Raymond Williams permet de corriger le déséquilibre discursif qui privilégie les formes « authentiques » par rapport aux formes euroaméricaines inuit. Mesurer la culture en termes d’expérience vécue plutôt qu’en termes de formes symboliques distinctes, comme le propose Williams, constitue la base pour identifier le substrat de continuités affectives qui perdurent alors que des formes plus tangibles s’érodent ou disparaissent. Des affectivités inuit distinctes qui s’attachent aux formes musicales non inuit sont à leur tour diffusées et partagées par la radio. Dans le paysage radio auditif-affectif qui en résulte, la portée affective d’une chanson est convertie en structures de sentiment sonore par l’interaction réflexive entre subjectivités émotionnelles individuelles et collectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".