MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954080388 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2018-0971

Flow and heat transfer of nanofluid in a channel partially filled with porous media considering turbulence effect in pores

2019· article· en· W2954080388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ali Asghar Sedighi, Zeynab Deldoost, Bahram Mahjoob Karambasti

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanofluidPorous mediumTurbulenceTurbulence kinetic energyNusselt numberPorosityThermodynamicsHeat transferMechanicsKinetic energyMaterials sciencePhysicsComposite materialReynolds numberClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flow and heat transfer of Al 2 O 3 –water nanofluid in a channel partially filled with porous media is investigated numerically. The turbulence effect in the porous media is taken under consideration in this article. A simple case is simulated first to evaluate the accuracy of the results in comparison with the available data. The turbulent kinetic energy profile is investigated at a flow cross section. The results show that the maximum turbulent kinetic energy occurs in the clear fluid region in the vicinity of the porous media region. The turbulent kinetic energy is a decreasing function of the porosity of the porous medium. The effect of porosity on the variation of turbulent kinetic energy decreases with the increase in the porosity of the porous medium. The turbulent kinetic energy in clear fluid and porous media regions decreases with the increase in nanofluid concentration from 0.01 to 0.03, and it increases with the increase in nanofluid concentration from 0.03 to 0.05. The temperature of the nanofluid increases with the increase in the nanofluid concentration and decrease in the porosity of porous media. It is shown that for this case, with the increase in nanofluid concentration and porosity of porous media, the skin friction coefficient increases and the Nusselt number decreases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.525
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNanofluid Flow and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207