MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MITIGASI BENCANA PADA ANAK USIA DINI

2019· article· id· W2954087076 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEARLY CHILDHOOD JURNAL PENDIDIKAN · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstraksi
 
 Bencana yang sering terjadi di Indonesia memberikan dampak yang serius bagi semua kalangan masyarakat, khususnya pada anak usia dini. Salah satu cara untuk mengurangi dampak bencana adalah dengan melakukan mitigasi bencana. Berdasarkan penelitian sebelumnya, mitigasi bencana pada anak usia dini untuk anak PAUD belum pernah dilakukan. Padahal mitigasi bencana atau penanganan bencana perlu diberikan sejak dini. Oleh karena itu peneliti akan melakukan mitigasi bencana, salah satunya tsunami pada anak usia dini (PAUD) dengan cara memberikan kegiatan bermain yang terdiri dari peningkatan wawasan tentang pengertian, dampak, dan keterampilan mitigasi bencana, hingga anak PAUD dalam melakukan simulasi sederhana dengan tenang, tanpa ada kepanikan. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah ditemukan, kegiatan bermain dapat menjadi salah satu cara untuk melakukan mitigasi bencana tsunami. Kegiatan bermain dengan tema bencana ini perlu dilakukan secara berkesimbungan agar proses evakuasi saat bencana dapat terekam lebih baik pada memori anak-anak dan hal yang terpenting adalah proses sosialisasi dan mitigasi bencana pun perlu dikuasi terlebih dahulu oleh guru.
 Kata kunci : mitigasi bencana, anak usia dini
 
 Abstract
 
 Disasters that often happened in Indonesia have a serious impact for all societies, especially in early childhood. One way to reduce the impact of disasters is to conduct disaster mitigation. Based on preceding research, disaster mitigation in early childhood had not been done. Whereas disaster mitigation or disaster management needed to be given early on. Therefore, researchers conducted disaster mitigation, for tsunami in early childhood education (PAUD) by providing playing activities focusing on increasing their insight on understanding about the disaster, knowing its impact and disaster mitigation skills. A simple simulation was done to the children of early childhood education calmly, without any panic.The results of research showed that playing activities could be one way to mitigate the tsunami disaster. The activities of disaster theme playing needed to be done continuously so that the evacuation process could be recorded well in children’s memory. The process of socialization and disaster mitigation were also needed to be mastered first by the teachers.
 Keyword : Mitigation, Early Childhood

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it