MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954094885 · doi:10.1109/synasc.2018.00023

Real-Time Computation of Legendre-Sobolev Approximations

2018· article· en· W2954094885 on OpenAlexaff
Parisa Alvandi, Stephen M. Watt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegendre polynomialsLegendre functionAssociated Legendre polynomialsMathematicsLegendre waveletSeries (stratigraphy)Sobolev spaceLegendre's equationRepresentation (politics)Mathematical analysisApplied mathematicsOrthogonal polynomialsComputer scienceClassical orthogonal polynomialsWaveletWavelet transformGegenbauer polynomials

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work is motivated by the problem of mathematical handwriting recognition where symbols are represented as plane curves, (X(λ), Y(λ)) parameterized by arc length λ ϵ [0, L]. Earlier work has shown that approximating the coordinate functions as certain truncated orthogonal polynomial series yields fast and effective recognition. It has been previously shown how to compute Legendre series representation in real time, as the curve is being traced out. In this article we show how to compute Legendre-Sobolev series representation in real time. The idea is to numerically integrate the moments of the coordinate functions as the curve is being traced. We show how the Legendre-Sobolev coefficients may be constructed either from the Legendre series coefficients or directly from the moments. Computing via Legendre series coefficients requires two matrix vector products, while the direct method requires only one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesFrench-language works237,207