MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954130885 · doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ab2d3b

Structural colour QR codes for multichannel information storage with enhanced optical security and life expectancy

2019· article· en· W2954130885 on OpenAlexaff
Mahssa Abdolahi, Hao Jiang, Bożena Kamińska

Bibliographic record

VenueNanotechnology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEncoding (memory)Computer scienceDecoding methodsCode (set theory)Computer hardwareMaterials scienceAlgorithmArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current schemes for encoding and decoding anticounterfeiting optical quick response (QR) codes involve miscellaneous challenges. The need for using multiple light sources to read out the wavelength-multiplexed data from optically encoded organic dyes, photoblinking from quantum dots, and autofluorescence from carbon dots are some typical examples. In order to address these restrictions, we exploited our previously devised nanoimprinting-exposure-thermal-treatment (NETT) data storage approach to present a new structural-colour-based regime for optical encoding of high-security QR codes. The angle-dependent readability of our diffraction-based nanostructures poses an enhanced optical security feature that can substitute the existing inefficient encoding strategies by eliminating the constraints associated with them. Additionally, in comparison with conventional optical encoding media, using the long-lasting photocrosslinked SU-8 in the NETT method considerably enhances the life expectancy of the proposed QR codes. Also, considering the rapid NETT-based Ni stamp origination method, which was previously introduced by our group, mass-generation of the proposed codes is feasible. Owing to the special optically variable effects provided by the nanostructures, duplication of our QR codes is very difficult. The colour code design, which embeds 766 characters in 2907 modules in red, green and blue channels, was generated and fabricated onto generic nanostructure arrays using the NETT process. The encoded information was successfully read out from the pattern using a broadband light source and a digital camera. Higher capacities are also deemed to be reachable by implementing image processing and machine learning algorithms to overcome in-channel module recognition and cross-channel interferences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanotechnologySame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207