Crowded plant height optimisation algorithm tuned maximum power point tracking for grid integrated solar power conditioning system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Solar energy is the base for both photovoltaic (PV) power generation and plant growth. Inspired by this biological phenomenon, a novel crowded plant height optimisation (CPHO) algorithm was developed for solar PV maximum power point tracking (MPPT). This CPHO‐tuned MPPT algorithm was developed with the aim of obtaining the optimal duty cycle ( d ) for DC‐DC boost converter for maximum solar power extraction from PV panels with the help of a proportional‐integral controller. Crowded plants regulate the growth of their stem height in relation to neighbouring plants, also known as height convergence. Using this CPHO‐algorithm, the stable height of the plant found in a numerical value is taken as the optimal height of the plant. This optimal numerical value was converted into ( d ) for the converter. Under dynamic weather conditions, the ( d ) was optimally adjusted by the proposed algorithm to regulate the DC output of the converter. On the utility side, d–q vector control‐based voltage source inverter was used for PV power integration into the grid. The performance of the converter control strategy of the proposed CPHO algorithm was compared with perturb and observe algorithm‐based MPPT control, which was analysed on MATLAB/Simulink platform.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".