MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The prevalence of cardiac risk factors in men with localized prostate cancer undergoing androgren deprivation therapy in British Columbia, Canada.

2013· article· en· W2954170173 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jennifer Rajala, Scott Tyldesley, Tom Pickles, Sean Virani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProstate cancerAndrogen deprivation therapyFramingham Risk ScoreRisk factorInternal medicineRadiation therapyCancerCoronary artery diseaseDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e16086 Background: While androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) decreases the risk of prostate cancer specific mortality in high risk localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy, it worsens cardiovascular (CV) risk factor profiles in treated men. Patients with pre-existing traditional cardiac risk factors who are treated with ADT have a higher rate of CV mortality than patients without risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of the last 100 consecutive men with intermediate or high risk localized prostate cancer who were referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency from October 1, 2011 to October 31, 2012 and treated with ADT. Inclusion criteria were referral to an oncologist within 3 months of diagnosis and a planned duration of ADT of 6 month or more. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis were excluded. Data on traditional cardiac risk factors were collected and a Framingham risk score was calculated on each patient to estimate their 10 year cardiac event risk. Results: The average age of the men referred for ADT was 71.7±7 years. Most, 70%, had poorly differentiated disease and the PSA was >10ug/L in 62%. An updated Charlson score of 0 was calculated in 82% of patients; only 4% had a score ≥2. The Framingham risk of a cardiac event in the next 10 years was calculated to be high (more than 20% risk) in 69%, intermediate (a 10-20% risk) in 30%, and low (<10% risk) in 1% of the patients. A history of coronary artery disease was present in 17 patients, 11 of whom had documented revascularization. Baseline type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance was present in 24 patients, and 58 patients had a history of hypertension. Lipid profiles had been measured within the past year in 38 patients, and 35 patients had a baseline ECG on the chart. Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of cardiac risk factors in men with prostate cancer referred for ADT, we recommend baseline cardiac risk screening of lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure in these patients with subsequent close monitoring of these parameters while on ADT. Among those individuals with established or symptomatic CV disease, we recommend referral to a specialist with expertise in cardiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→