MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954205242 · doi:10.3389/fmars.2019.00317

Toward a Coordinated Global Observing System for Seagrasses and Marine Macroalgae

2019· article· en· W2954205242 on OpenAlexaff
J. Emmett Duffy, Lisandro Benedetti‐Cecchi, Joaquín Triñanes, Frank Müller‐Karger, Rohani Ambo‐Rappe, Christoffer Boström, Alejandro H. Buschmann, Jarrett E. K. Byrnes, Rob Coles, Joel C. Creed, Leanne C. Cullen‐Unsworth, Guillermo Díaz-Pulido, Carlos M. Duarte, Graham J. Edgar, Miguel D. Fortes, Gustavo Goñi, Chuanmin Hu, Xiaoping Huang, Catriona L. Hurd, Craig R. Johnson, Brenda Konar, Dorte Krause‐Jensen, Kira A. Krumhansl, Peter I. Macreadie, Helene Marsh, Len McKenzie, Nova Mieszkowska, Patricia Miloslavich, Enrique Montes, Masahiro Nakaoka, Kjell Magnus Norderhaug, Lina M. Norlund, Robert J. Orth, Anchana Prathep, Nathan F. Putman, Jimena Samper‐Villarreal, Ester Á. Serrão, Frederick T. Short, Isabel Sousa‐Pinto, Peter D. Steinberg, Rick D. Stuart‐Smith, Richard K. F. Unsworth, M. van Keulen, Brigitta I. van Tussenbroek, Mengqiu Wang, Michelle Waycott, Lauren V. Weatherdon, Thomas Wernberg, Siti Maryam Yaakub

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Marine Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
FundersBureau of Ocean Energy ManagementNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSmithsonian InstitutionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOceanographyEnvironmental scienceFisheryGeographyBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In coastal areas around the world, the dominant primary producers are benthic macrophytes, including seagrasses and macroalgae, that provide habitat structure and food for diverse and abundant populations and communities, and drive ecosystem processes. Seagrass meadows and macroalgal forests are economically central to coastal human communities, particularly in the developing world, contributing to fisheries yield, storm protection, blue carbon storage, and important cultural values. These services are threatened worldwide by human activities, with substantial areas of seagrass and kelp forests lost over the last half-century. Tracking status and trends in marine macrophyte cover and quality is an emerging priority for ocean and coastal management, but doing so has been challenged by limited coordination across the numerous efforts to monitor macrophytes, which vary widely in goals, methodologies, scales, capacity, governance approaches, and data availability. Here, we present a consensus assessment and recommendations on the current state of and opportunities for advancing global marine macrophyte observations, integrating contributions from a community of researchers with broad geographic and disciplinary expertise. The time is ripe to harmonize marine macrophyte observations by building on existing networks and identifying a core set of common metrics and approaches in sampling design, field measurements, taxonomy, governance, capacity building, and data management. A global macrophyte observation community would then be facilitated by ensuring rigorous documentation, archiving and open-access sharing of protocols and resources at all stages of workflow, from field surveys to data management, and provision of open-access data. Realizing these recommendations will produce more effective, efficient, and responsive observing, a more accurate global picture of change in macrophyte systems, and stronger international capacity for sustaining observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.033
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0330.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.008
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations219
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Marine ScienceSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207