MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954228602 · doi:10.1139/cjss-2018-0104

Characteristics of CO<sub>2</sub>, water vapor, and energy exchanges at a headwater wetland ecosystem of the Qinghai Lake

2019· article· en· W2954228602 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shengkui Cao, Guangchao Cao, Kelong Chen, Guangzhao Han, Ying Liu, Yufan Yang, Xiaodong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationRecruitment Program of Global ExpertsChinese Academy of SciencesMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsEcosystem respirationEvapotranspirationWetlandEcosystemEnvironmental scienceLatent heatPrimary productionBowen ratioHydrology (agriculture)Atmospheric sciencesPrecipitationPlateau (mathematics)Carbon dioxideAnimal scienceEcologyGeographyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ecosystem carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, and heat exchanges in alpine wetlands on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau are not comprehensively understood. Thus, we studied variability of net ecosystem CO2 exchange (NEE), ecosystem respiration (Re), gross primary production (GPP), evapotranspiration (ET), and heat fluxes over a headwater wetland ecosystem in the Qinghai Lake region. Results showed that the headwater wetland ecosystem was net CO2 absorption on the annual scale, in which monthly NEE, GPP, and Re in two consecutive years varied from −165.16 to 93 g CO2 m−2 mo−1, 6.66 to 384.45 g CO2 m−2 mo−1, and 6.9 to 232.02 g CO2 m−2 mo−1, respectively. The monthly ET from June to September was smaller than precipitation; these results reversed in the remaining months. Annual ET was 362.1 mm in 2015 and 324.96 mm in 2016. The net radiation (Rn), sensible heat (H), latent heat (LE), and ground heat (G) fluxes showed similar monthly patterns. Values of monthly average half-hour Rn, H, LE, and G at the daytime showed Rn > LE > H > G, and the time of the monthly half-hour G peak obviously lagged the Rn, H, and LE. Monthly average Bowen ratios were <1 from May to October, but it reversed in the rest of the months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil ScienceSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207