MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Maternal Water Exercise And Its Effects On Weight Gain And Fetal Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

2019· article· en· W2954293172 on OpenAlexaff
Roberta Bgeginski, Taniya S. Nagpal, Michelle F. Mottola

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeta-analysisMedicineWeight gainRandomized controlled trialPregnancyGestational agePrenatal careObstetricsMEDLINEPhysical therapyBody weightInternal medicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical activity during pregnancy is known to bring benefits not only for the mother but also for the fetus. Water-based exercises have been recommended as an adequate modality of exercise during pregnancy, however, no meta-analysis has analyzed the effects of water exercise programs on maternal weight gain and fetal outcomes including birthweight. PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate the effects of prenatal water-based exercise on maternal weight gain and fetal outcomes. METHODS: Eligible trials were identified by a structured search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and SportDiscus up to October 2018. Data were retrieved comparing standard care with standard care plus prenatal water exercise (at least once a week) for at least one of the following outcomes: maternal weight gain, gestational age at delivery, and/or fetal birthweight. Study selection and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for mean difference between exercise and control groups (PROSPERO registration: CRD42016039473). RESULTS: Our search yielded 1846 publications of which 1562 were assessed for eligibility. In total, 9 studies were eligible and included in the meta-analysis. Pregnant women who engaged in a water exercise program showed a significant difference in total maternal weight gain (5 RCTs, n=561, OR -1.00 [95% CI -1.55, -0.45], p<0.001) compared to standard care only. No significant effects on gestational age at delivery (8 RCTs, n=1442, OR 0.04 [95% CI -1.02, 1.10], p=0.94) and birthweight (8 RCTs, n=1427, OR -24.32 [95% CI -86.44, 37.80]) were found. CONCLUSION: Water exercise during pregnancy controls maternal weight gain without influencing the duration of pregnancy or baby weight. Health care providers can consider suggesting water-based exercises during pregnancy to promote appropriate weight gain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.050
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicGestational Diabetes Research and Management→French-language works237,207→