MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2954350662 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.181606

Embracing the science of value in health

2019· article· en· W2954350662 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Murray Krahn, Stirling Bryan, Man Yee Karen Lee, Peter J. Neumann

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Academic Health Science NetworkOttawa Public HealthToronto General HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteToronto Public HealthVancouver Coastal HealthUniversity of OttawaCanadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStewardship (theology)LegislationVariety (cybernetics)Key (lock)Value (mathematics)Resource (disambiguation)Public relationsComputer sciencePolitical scienceLawComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS “Resource stewardship” is recognized as a key social value in Canada’s health system. This is enshrined in both legislation[1][1] and a variety of reform initiatives.[2][2],[3][3] Canadians want a health system that meets their needs, is informed by evidence and fair, but also one

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.060
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.060
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.090
Scholarly communication0.0160.015
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0100.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→