Traduction du référentiel du vieillissement actif au Québec et enjeux d’activation du vieillir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir d’une analyse documentaire, cet article expose le développement historique du référentiel du vieillissement actif et sa traduction dans la province du Québec (Canada). Au regard de ce cadre référentiel, trois types de politiques d’activation du vieillissement sont identifiées : celles ayant trait à l’allongement des carrières et des mesures graduelles de sortie d’emploi ; celles concernant la prise en charge des proches ; celles à propos de la participation sociale. La discussion met l’accent sur les rapports de pouvoir véhiculés à travers les discours sous-jacents au vieillir actif, ainsi que sur la notion d’activité. La conclusion propose un changement de paradigme, d’un référentiel d’activation du vieillissement vers un référentiel en mesure de mieux prendre en charge les fragilités de l’avancée en âge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".