MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954370082 · doi:10.1134/s2075111719020097

Thladiantha dubia (Cucurbitaceae) in the Republic of Bashkortostan as a Dangerous Weed with High Invasive Potential

2019· article· en· W2954370082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Biological Invasions · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPowdery Mildew Fungal Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeedBiologyPopulationLianaEcologyBotanyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Thladiantha dubia Bunge is a perennial herbaceous climbing liana from Cucurbitaceae family, which is found naturally in the Russian Far East (mainly in the south of Primorsky krai) and beyond in Northeastern China and on the Korean Peninsula. T. dubia is cultivated for decorative purposes, but owing to the ability to rapidly reproduce by underground tubers, it often turns into a dangerous weed. T. dubia is common in Russia, as well as in Japan, Europe, the United States, and Canada. We have found and studied large invasive populations of T. dubia in several villages of the Republic of Bashkortostan, in an area of 60 km north of the city of Ufa. In this area, it is known exclusively as a dangerous and hard-to-eradicate weed; it appeared here in the 1970s and continues to propagate rapidly by pieces of tubers during mechanical soil treatment. By artificial reproduction of T. dubia plants by small pieces of tubers in laboratory conditions, a very high capability of vegetative reproduction of this plant was revealed. Comparative RAPD and ISSR analyses of samples from the natural population of T. dubia from Primorsky krai of the Russian Federation and its invasive population from the Republic of Bashkortostan showed genetic differences between the analyzed populations, which can be a reflection of the formation of an aggressive form of this plant in the secondary range. From the data we have received and from the literature, it follows that T. dubia species needs to be classified as a weed with a high invasive potential, and therefore, during its cultivation, all necessary measures should be taken to exclude its distribution in natural biocoenoses and agroecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it