Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’évocation des présents diplomatiques dans les sources a, pendant longtemps et à quelques exceptions près, été abordée au mieux sous l’angle de l’anecdote, au pire sous celui de la tentativne de corruption. La réorientation du questionnement historique vers le fait diplomatique permet aujourd’hui de les envisager comme des gestes destinés à la mise en place d’une communication. C’est ce dont témoigne Priscus, quand il relate l’ambassade de Maximinus, envoyé par l’empereur Théodose II à Attila en 449. Il mentionne les présents offerts ou reçus par les acteurs de cet échange diplomatique, dont Maximinus lui-même, à la fois donateur et bénéficiaire, véritable pivot de cette pratique. Si les présents sont un moyen concret d’instaurer des relations personnelles pour le légat romain, ils sont pour Attila un moyen d’affirmer sa supériorité politique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".