MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954377994 · doi:10.1186/s40425-019-0640-y

Correction to: Toward a comprehensive view of cancer immune responsiveness: a synopsis from the SITC workshop

2019· article· en· W2954377994 on OpenAlexaff
Davide Bedognetti, Michele Ceccarelli, Lorenzo Galluzzi, Rongze Lu, Karolina Palucka, Josue Samayoa, Stefani Spranger, Sarah Warren, Kwok‐Kin Wong, Elad Ziv, Diego Chowell, Lisa M. Coussens, Daniel D. De Carvalho, David G. DeNardo, Jérôme Galon, Howard L. Kaufman, Tomas Kirchhoff, Michael T. Lotze, Jason J. Luke, Andy J. Minn, Katerina Politi, Leonard D. Shultz, Richard Simon, Vésteinn Thórsson, Joanne B. Weidhaas, Maria Libera Ascierto, Paolo A. Ascierto, J. Matthew Barnes, Valentin Barsan, Praveen K. Bommareddy, Adrian Bot, S. Church, Gennaro Ciliberto, Andrea De Maria, Dobrin Draganov, Winson S. Ho, Heather M. McGee, Anne Monette, Joseph F. Murphy, Paola Nisticò, Wungki Park, Maulik Patel, Michael Quigley, Laszlo Radvanyi, Harry Raftopoulos, Nils-Petter Rudqvist, Alexandra Snyder, Randy F. Sweis, Sara Valpione, Roberta Zappasodi, Lisa H. Butterfield, Mary L. Disis, Bernard A. Fox, Alessandra Cesano, Francesco M. Marincola

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsCaprion (Canada)Ontario Institute for Cancer ResearchJewish General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesSociety for Immunotherapy of CancerNational Cancer InstituteCelgene
KeywordsLibrary scienceComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following publication of the original article [1], the author reported that an author name, Roberta Zappasodi, was missed in the authorship list. Davide Bedognetti, Rongze Lu, Josue Samayoa, Stefani Spranger and Sarah Warren contributed equally to this work. The original article can be found online at 10.1186/s40425-019-0602-4

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.072
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.072
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0070.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for ImmunoTherapy of CancerSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207