MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954410209 · doi:10.14740/jnr.v9i3.537

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Related to Chronic Use of Mesalamine: A Case Report and Literature Review

2019· article· en· W2954410209 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dev Mehta, Mohammed El‐Hunjul, Hussam A. Yacoub

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePapilledemaDiplopiaAcetazolamideHeadachesAsymptomaticDiscontinuationSurgeryPseudotumor cerebriPediatricsAnesthesiaIntracranial pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is commonly seen related to iatrogenic causes such as excess retinol, tetracyclines, and amiodarone. We report a case of IIH likely related to mesalamine use. A 63-year-old woman presented with transient episodes of diplopia and headaches. She was diagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome and started on mesalamine 8 months prior. Her neurologic examination was significant for papilledema and bilateral partial abducens nerve palsies. Her opening pressure was 27 cm H 2 O. Discontinuation of mesalamine in conjunction with acetazolamide correlated with improvement of her papilledema and diplopia. At 6-month follow-up, she still remained asymptomatic. IIH is likely a rare side effect of mesalamine use likely related to 5-aminosalycilate use. This class of medication typically causes headache so this is likely a more complex version. The mechanism of how this occurs is largely unknown. Patients presenting with new onset headache or diplopia acutely or chronically on mesalamine should have ophthalmologic evaluation urgently to evaluate for IIH. J Neurol Res. 2019;9(3):39-40 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr537

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicCerebral Venous Sinus ThrombosisFrench-language works237,207