Bibliographic record
Abstract
Non-Chinese Maoists observed the advent of Deng to power in post-Maoist China with similar misgivings. In the United States, Charles Bettelheim saw Deng’s projected policies as an explicit repudiation not only of Maoism but of Marxism in general. In Canada, Michel Chossudovsky warned that the policies of Deng Xiaoping were not only anti-Maoist and “bourgeois” in essence but threatened a “restoration of capitalism” as well as a fallback to the policies of the reactionary Kuomintang. Before the passing of Mao Zedong, Maoists argued that the preoccupation with growth and technological development implied an infatuation with foreign industrial systems and generated an abiding admiration for “all things foreign” among the people of China. Deng Xiaoping clearly recognized substantial compatibilities between Mao’s “new democracy” of the 1940s and the anti-Marxist developmental convictions of Sun. The identification of Sun’s developmental nationalism with “protofascism” recalls, once again, the similarities shared by many reactive nationalisms in the twentieth century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".