Bibliographic record
Abstract
Globally an estimated 250 million children (43%) younger than 5 years of age are at risk of not reaching their full developmental potential [[1]Black M.M. Walker S.P. Fernald L.C.H. et al.Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course.Lancet. 2016; 6736: 1-14Google Scholar]. The Sustainable Development Goals have prioritized early child development outcomes - seeing it as essential to the transformation the world needs to achieve by 2030 [[2]Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Platform. 2015 [cited 2019 Feb 22]. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/Google Scholar]. Early childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes have a key impact on long-term individual and population health outcomes. Childhood stunting (height-for-age; HAZ < -2) is identified as an important risk factor for poor child development. Significant associations have been identified between stunting and motor and cognitive development in children two years of age or younger [[3]Prado E.L. Abbeddou S. Adu-afarwuah S. et al.Linear growth and child development in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Malawi.Pediatrics. 2016; 138e20154698https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-4698Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar,[4]Sudfeld C.R. McCoy D.C. Danaei G. et al.Linear growth and child development in low- and middle-income countries; a meta-analysis.Pediatric. 2015; 135: e1266-e1275https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3111Crossref PubMed Scopus (236) Google Scholar]. However how specifically stunting influences child neurodevelopment remains unknown. Growing evidence demonstrates the independent and interrelated roles of both malnutrition and inflammation on neurodevelopment [[5]Suchdev P.S. Boivin M.J. Forsyth B.W. et al.Assessment of neurodevelopment, nutrition, and inflammation from fetal life to adolescence in low-resource settings.Pediatrics. 2017; 139: S23-S37Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar]. Importantly, current interventions aimed at preventing stunting (e.g. maternal diet supplementation, prevention of infection during pregnancy and the promotion of breastfeeding) and treating stunting (e.g. diet diversification and diet supplementation of children) have only be marginally effective and for most of these interventions the impact on child development outcomes remain unclear [[4]Sudfeld C.R. McCoy D.C. Danaei G. et al.Linear growth and child development in low- and middle-income countries; a meta-analysis.Pediatric. 2015; 135: e1266-e1275https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3111Crossref PubMed Scopus (236) Google Scholar,[6]Mosites E. Dawson-Hahn E. Walson J. et al.Piecing together the stunting puzzle: a framework for attributable factors of child stunting.Paediatr Int Child Health. 2017; 37: 158-165Crossref PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar]. New targeted interventions are urgently needed to address both stunting and child neurodevelopmental outcomes in order to meet the Sustainable Development Goals. The article of Moreau et al. in EBioMedicine is an excellent example of innovative research that explored the association between metabolic pathways and both linear growth and cognitive outcomes [[7]Moreau G.B. Ramakrishnan G. Cook H.L. et al.Childhood growth and neurocognition are associated with distinct sets of metabolites.EBioMedicine. 2019; 44: 597-606Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar]. The authors performed targeted metabolomics on a sub-cohort (n = 130) of the PROVIDE study which was designed to examine oral vaccine efficacy in a longitudinal cohort of undernourished children in Bangladesh [[8]Kirkpatrick B.D. Colgate E.R. Mychaleckyj J.C. et al.The “Performance of Rotavirus and oral Polio Vaccines in Developing Countries”(PROVIDE) study: description of methods of an interventional study designed to explore complex biologic problems.Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015; 92: 744-751Crossref PubMed Scopus (73) Google Scholar]. The prevalence of stunting was 10.8% at enrollment and 29.6% at 2 years of age in this sub-cohort and remained fairly stable – with a high percentage children at risk for stunting (HAZ between −1 and >−2). Neurocognitive outcomes were assessed with the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III) at 4 years of age. Plasma samples were collected at 9- and 36-month time points for each child. The authors identified an association between distinct metabolites and growth and neurocognitive outcomes; interestingly growth outcomes were mainly predicted by 9-month metabolic profiles and neurocognitive outcomes mainly by 36-month metabolic profiles. Improved growth outcomes were seen with increased hydroxy-sphingomyelin and phosphatidylcholine levels and total essential amino acids. Higher neurocognitive scores were seen in children who had higher levels of phosphatidylcholines. Poor growth outcomes were associated with high levels of medium to long chain acylcarnitines and bile acid conjugation. Acylcarnitines and aminoacids were generally not associated with neurocognitive outcomes, with one exception; the amino acid Threonine measured at both 9 and 36 months was positively associated with neurocognitive outcomes. The study of Moreau et al. is one of the first studies that demonstrated that separate metabolic pathways might relate to stunting and neurocognition [[7]Moreau G.B. Ramakrishnan G. Cook H.L. et al.Childhood growth and neurocognition are associated with distinct sets of metabolites.EBioMedicine. 2019; 44: 597-606Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (20) Google Scholar]. The wide range of metabolites associated with growth outcomes could be related to factors such as insufficient diet and environmental enteric dysfunction and have been identified in other studies [[9]Di Giovanni V. Bourdon C. Wang D.X. et al.Metabolomic changes in serum of children with different clinical diagnoses of malnutrition.J Nutr. 2016; 146: 2436-2444Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar]. Although growth parameters were measured longitudinally – only some children had neurocognition outcomes measured at two time points. Development is a nonlinear process and it is unclear if the identified metabolites influenced individual developmental trajectories. In addition, important predictors for child development e.g. maternal mental health were not accounted for. Unexpectedly, not the 9-month but only the 36-month phosphatidylcholines were predominantly associated with neurocognitive outcomes. Phosphatidylcholines are the main component of plasma membranes and low circulating phosphatidylcholines have been linked to increased gut permeability [[9]Di Giovanni V. Bourdon C. Wang D.X. et al.Metabolomic changes in serum of children with different clinical diagnoses of malnutrition.J Nutr. 2016; 146: 2436-2444Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar]. Additionally, the synthesis of sphingomyelins, which are essential for myelination, depends on phosphatidylcholines. In a study by Di Giovanni et al. children with severe acute malnutrition demonstrated delayed phosphatidylcholine recovery even after nutritional rehabilitation [[9]Di Giovanni V. Bourdon C. Wang D.X. et al.Metabolomic changes in serum of children with different clinical diagnoses of malnutrition.J Nutr. 2016; 146: 2436-2444Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar]. This could suggest that the 36-month phosphatidylcholines are biomarkers of a chronic process occurring later in childhood. Further research should explore the role of phosphatidylcholines in younger children and their relation to gut health and neurodevelopmental trajectories. Interestingly, both the 9- and 36-month plasma levels of Threonine, an essential amino acid that supports the central nervous and immune system and is also a major component of the intestinal mucosa, were associated with neurocognitive scores. In the study of Moreau et al. it would have been interesting to combine the results of metabolomics with levels of systemic inflammatory markers (e.g. C-reactive protein, pro-inflammatory cytokines), biomarkers of intestinal inflammation and barrier dysfunction (e.g. fecal biomarkers like calprotectin) and microbiome analysis in order to provide further insight in possible mechanistic pathways. The research by Moreau et al. made an important contribution to our understanding of the association between growth, metabolism and neurocognitive outcomes. However, in order to develop targeted interventions longitudinal research is needed that focuses on the complex relationship between nutrition, inflammation and neurodevelopment outcomes [[5]Suchdev P.S. Boivin M.J. Forsyth B.W. et al.Assessment of neurodevelopment, nutrition, and inflammation from fetal life to adolescence in low-resource settings.Pediatrics. 2017; 139: S23-S37Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar]. This research should also include more functional and structural outcomes of brain development in order to allow for a better understanding how specific aspects of nutrition, metabolomics and inflammation impact neurodevelopment [[10]John C.C. Black M.M. Nelson C.A. Neurodevelopment: the impact of nutrition and inflammation during early to middle childhood in low-resource settings.Pediatrics. 2017; 139: S59-S71Crossref PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. The author declared no conflicts of interest. Childhood growth and neurocognition are associated with distinct sets of metabolitesGrowth outcomes were predominantly associated with metabolites measured early in life (9 months), many of which were biomarkers of insufficient diet, environmental enteric dysfunction, and microbiome disruption. Hydroxy-sphingomyelin was a significant predictor of improved growth. Neurocognitive outcome was predominantly associated with 36 month phosphatidylcholines and inflammatory metabolites, which may serve as important biomarkers of optimal neurodevelopment. The distinct sets of metabolites associated with growth and neurocognition suggest that intervention may require targeted approaches towards distinct metabolic pathways. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".