Transition écologique et action syndicale : le rôle des syndicats québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article examine la façon dont les centrales syndicales québécoises conçoivent leur rôle, les défis auxquels elles font face et les actions qu’elles entreprennent dans le contexte de la transition écologique, alors que celle-ci risque d’avoir des effets importants sur l’emploi et le contenu du travail. Nous nous appuyons sur trente entretiens menés auprès des trois plus grandes centrales syndicales du Québec, ainsi que de représentants du milieu des technologies propres de la province. Nous constatons que la volonté des organisations syndicales québécoises de participer activement à la lutte contre les changements climatiques ne suffit pas pour définir clairement leur rôle dans la transition écologique. L’ambivalence de leur position, due à l’imbrication entre la crise écologique, les modes de production industrielle et l’emploi, continue de teinter tant leurs prises de position que leurs actions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".