MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954439104

Andrew Feenberg, Philosophie de la praxis. Marx, Lukács et l’école de Francfort. Montréal : Lux, collection « Humanités », 2016 (544 p.)

2017· article· fr· W2954439104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alix Bouffard

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPraxisHumanitiesEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andrew Feenberg est un philosophe americain dont l’œuvre est essentiellement consacree a une reflexion sur la technique. Ancien eleve de Herbert Marcuse, il a par ailleurs etudie a de nombreuses reprises les differentes pensees que l’on regroupe sous l’appellation d’« Ecole de Francfort ». Dans Philosophie de la praxis, troisieme de ses livres faisant l’objet d’une traduction francaise, Feenberg articule en neuf chapitres une reconstruction historique et critique de ce qu’il nomme « philosoph...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers philosophiques de StrasbourgSame topicPhilosophical and Theoretical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207