MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954439104

Andrew Feenberg, Philosophie de la praxis. Marx, Lukács et l’école de Francfort. Montréal : Lux, collection « Humanités », 2016 (544 p.)

2017· article· fr· W2954439104 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alix Bouffard

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers philosophiques de Strasbourg · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPraxisHumanitiesEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andrew Feenberg est un philosophe americain dont l’œuvre est essentiellement consacree a une reflexion sur la technique. Ancien eleve de Herbert Marcuse, il a par ailleurs etudie a de nombreuses reprises les differentes pensees que l’on regroupe sous l’appellation d’« Ecole de Francfort ». Dans Philosophie de la praxis, troisieme de ses livres faisant l’objet d’une traduction francaise, Feenberg articule en neuf chapitres une reconstruction historique et critique de ce qu’il nomme « philosoph...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.569

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.011
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers philosophiques de StrasbourgSame topicPhilosophical and Theoretical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207