MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954443510

Ethics Recommendations for Crisis Translation Settings

2019· article· en· W2954443510 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dónal P O’Mathúna, Carla Parra Escartín, Helena Moniz, Jay Marlowe, Matthew Hunt, Eric De Luca, Federico Federici, Sharon O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueArrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean CommissionMcGill University
KeywordsEuropean unionPolitical scienceHorizonPublic relationsEngineering ethicsBusinessEngineeringEconomic policy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This document is a summary public version of the Ethics Recommendations for Crisis\nTranslation Settings produced by some of the INTERACT project team. INTERACT is the\nInternational Network in Crisis Translation, a project funded by the European Union’s Horizon\n2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement\nNo. 734211. Further information about the project as a whole is available at:\nhttps://sites.google.com/view/crisistranslation/home

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.084
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.191
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0840.191
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0180.021
Open science0.0050.013
Research integrity0.0250.028
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.140
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology)Same topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207