Bibliographic record
Abstract
Una mejor comprensión de la fisiología del ciclo estral y la función ovárica ha resultado en una mayor capacidad para manipular su control. Descubrimientos recientes de las funciones del cuerpo lúteo y las ondas foliculares del ciclo estral bovino se han traducido en un renovado entusiasmo por las oportunidades de poder lograr un mejor control de la inducción de la ovulación y una más precisa sincronización del ciclo estral. El alto nivel de interés se refleja en el gran aumento de revisiones publicadas sobre la manipulación del ciclo estral durante los últimos años (Odde, 1990; Larson y Ball, 1992; Wiltbank, 1997; Roche et al., 1997; Mapletoft et al., 2002; Macmillan et al ., 2003; Kastelic et al., 2008; Macmillan, 2010; Colazo y Mapletoft 2014). La intención de este manuscrito es proporcionar una visión general de los eventos ováricos normales en el ganado bovino adulto y prepúber, con la idea de impulsar una discusión para aumentar aun más nuestra capacidad de manipulación del ciclo estral bovino DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.19137/cienvet2014-1623
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".