MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954489650

Bayesian Nonparametric Clustering of Continuous-Time Hidden Markov Models for Health Trajectories

2019· preprint· en· W2954489650 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Luo, David A. Stephens, David L. Buckeridge

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirichlet processCluster analysisMarkov chain Monte CarloHierarchical Dirichlet processGibbs samplingInferenceComputer scienceMarkov chainBayesian inferenceMarkov modelHidden Markov modelNonparametric statisticsBayesian probabilityEconometricsData miningMathematicsArtificial intelligenceMachine learningTopic modelLatent Dirichlet allocation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop clustering procedures for healthcare trajectories based on a continuous-time hidden Markov model and a generalized linear observation model. Specifically, we carry out Bayesian nonparametric inference for a Dirichlet process mixture model, and utilize restricted Gibbs sampling split-merge proposals to achieve inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo. In our analysis on a large Canadian cohort of subjects suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a three-cluster model is chosen, and the inferred Markov transition rate matrix in each cluster suggests that each cluster has its own transition characteristics and observation process, and that patients are more likely to stay in more severe disease states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207