MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954557463 · doi:10.1093/ons/opz154

Robot-Assisted Insular Depth Electrode Implantation Through Oblique Trajectories: 3-Dimensional Anatomical Nuances, Technique, Accuracy, and Safety

2019· article· en· W2954557463 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperative Neurosurgery · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOblique caseMedicineInsular cortexMagnetic resonance imagingCadaveric spasmInsulaRadiologySurgeryPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The insula is a deep cortical structure that has renewed interest in epilepsy investigation. Invasive EEG recordings of this region have been challenging. Robot-assisted stereotactic electroencephalography has improved feasibility and safety of such procedures. OBJECTIVE: To describe technical nuances of three-dimensional (3D) oblique trajectories for insular robot-assisted depth electrode implantation. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent robot-assisted depth electrode implantation between June 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Insular electrodes were implanted through oblique, orthogonal, or parasagittal trajectories. Type of trajectories, accuracy, number of contacts within insular cortex, imaging, and complication rates were analyzed. Cadaveric and computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging 3D reconstructions were used to visualize insular anatomy and the technical implications of oblique trajectories. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (98 insular electrodes) were included. Thirty (73.2%) patients had unilateral insular coverage. Average insular electrodes per patient was 2.4. The mean number of contacts was 7.1 (SD ± 2.91) for all trajectories and 8.3 (SD ± 1.51) for oblique insular trajectories. The most frequently used was the oblique trajectory (85 electrodes). Mean entry point error was 1.5 mm (0.2-2.8) and target error was 2.4 mm (0.8-4.0), 2.0 mm (1.1-2.9) for anterior oblique and 2.8 mm (0.8-4.9) for posterior oblique trajectories. There were no complications related to insular electrodes. CONCLUSION: Oblique trajectories are the preferred method for insular investigation at our institution, maximizing the number of contacts within insular cortex without traversing through sulci or major CSF fissures. Robot-assisted procedures are safe and efficient. 3D understanding of the insula's unique anatomical features can help the surgeon to improve targeting of this structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.839

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it