MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954576481 · doi:10.3224/gender.v11i2.14

Ingrid Jungwirth/Andrea Wolffram (Hrsg.), 2017: Hochqualifizierte Migrantinnen. Teilhabe an Arbeit und Gesellschaft. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich. 249 Seiten. 28 Euro

2019· article· de· W2954576481 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGENDER – Zeitschrift für Geschlecht Kultur und Gesellschaft · 2019
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldHealth Professions
TopicSocial and Demographic Issues in Germany
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Social FundBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bibliographie: Steinmetz, Sandra: Ingrid Jungwirth/Andrea Wolffram (Hrsg.), 2017: Hochqualifizierte Migrantinnen. Teilhabe an Arbeit und Gesellschaft. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich. 249 Seiten. 28 Euro, GENDER - Zeitschrift für Geschlecht, Kultur und Gesellschaft, 2-2019, S. 166-168. https://doi.org/10.3224/gender.v11i2.14

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it