Analysis of <i>DNM3</i> and <i>VAMP4</i> as genetic modifiers of <i>LRRK2</i> Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective To assess genetic modifiers of Parkinson’s disease (PD) age at onset (AAO) penetrance in individuals carrying common and rare LRRK2 risk alleles Methods We analysed reported genetic modifier DNM3 rs2421947 in 724 LRRK2 p.G2019S heterozygotes using linear regression of AAO. We meta-analysed our data with previously published data (n=754). VAMP4 is in close proximity to DNM3 and is associated with PD. We analysed the effect of the rs11578699 VAMP4 variant on pG2019S penetrance in 786 LRRK2 p.G2019S heterozygotes. We also evaluated the impact of VAMP4 variants using AAO regression in 4882 patients with PD carrying a common LRRK2 risk variant (rs10878226). Results There was no evidence for linkage disequilibrium between DNM3 rs2421947 and VAMP4 rs11578699. Our linear regression AAO of 724 p.G2019S carriers showed no relationship between DNM3 rs2421947 and AAO (beta = −1.19, p = 0.55, n =708). Meta-analysis with previously published data did not indicate a significant effect on AAO (beta = −2.21, p = 0.083, n = 1304), but there was significant heterogeneity in the analyses of new and previously published data. VAMP4 rs11578699 was nominally associated with AAO in patients dichotomized by the common LRRK2 risk variant rs10878226 (beta=1.68, se=0.81 p=0.037). Interpretation Analysis of DNM3 in previously unpublished data does not show an interaction between DNM3 and LRRK2 G2019S for AAO, however the inter-study heterogeneity may indicate ethnic-specific effects of DNM3 rs2421947. Analysis of sporadic PD patients stratified by the PD risk variant rs10878226 indicates a possible interaction between LRRK2 and VAMP4 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.028 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".