MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954595837 · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.132

Remanufacturing Network Design for Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain

2019· article· en· W2954595837 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia CIRP · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSustainable Supply Chain Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemanufacturingSupply chainClosed loopProfit (economics)Reverse logisticsSupply chain networkChannel (broadcasting)BusinessDual (grammatical number)Industrial organizationComputer scienceSupply chain managementManufacturing engineeringOperations researchEngineeringMicroeconomicsMarketingEconomicsComputer networkControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) is a prominent concept emphasizing on both economic and environmental aspects. A traditional view on these CLSCs for remanufacturing consists of two stages: forward logistics and reverse logistics. There is very little literature considering the impact of dual-channel business on closed loop supply chain network design for remanufacturing. In this research, we consider a CLSC where the remanufacturer needs to satisfy the demands from both online and office channels, A mixed integer nonlinear program is developed to determine the optimal network, and prices of both online and office return, with the objective of maximizing the manufacturer's profit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it