Expériences contemporaines du temps, de la mémoire et de l’histoire: entretien avec Judy Quinn, Daniel Grenier et Carl Leblanc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 14 juin 2016 a eu lieu, à la Maison de la littérature à Québec, une journée d’étude intitulée « Expériences du temps, de la mémoire et de l’histoire dans les écritures contemporaines québécoises ». Nous y avions convié trois écrivains, Daniel Grenier, Carl Leblanc et Judy Quinn, à venir s’exprimer sur la question de ces expériences dans leurs œuvres respectives et ce, à partir de leur point de vue d’écrivain. L’échange, fort riche, nous a donné envie de poursuivre la réflexion avec eux sous forme d’entretien écrit, en appelant à une lecture croisée de leurs œuvres. Ils ont accepté de collaborer à ce nouveau projet, réalisé en 2017, avec enthousiasme, et nous les en remercions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".