Impacto dos Fármacos nos Recursos Hídricos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Os fármacos agregam bastantes benefícios na qualidade de vida da população, mas os resíduos de origem farmacêutica não estão na visão das pessoas como uma situação que mereça entendimento e esclarecimentos sobre o descarte e sua destinação correta. O presente trabalho teve como objetivo realizar uma revisão bibliográfica sobre a problemática dos fármacos no ambiente com ênfase nos impactos causados aos recursos hídricos. Ainda existe necessidades de pesquisas para remoção destes compostos da água para se tornarem potáveis, precisa ter uma nova metodologia de tratamento, onde os fármacos necessitam estar presentes nas legislações e a sociedade precisa aprender e se conscientizar sobre o descarte adequado e a importância da necessidade da logística reversa nas farmácias. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Contaminantes emergentes, qualidade da água, conscientização.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".