MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954734636 · doi:10.1109/tem.2019.2912928

Tensor-Train-Based High-Order Dominant Eigen Decomposition for Multimodal Prediction Services

2019· article· en· W2954734636 on OpenAlexaff
Huazhong Liu, Laurence T. Yang, Jihong Ding, Yimu Guo, Stephen S. Yau

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicTensor decomposition and applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesShenzhen Fundamental Research ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityComputationTensor (intrinsic definition)Big dataCurse of dimensionalityData miningArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmMachine learningMathematicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By leveraging neoteric analytical techniques associated with big data, numerous new data-focused computation and service models have flourished in service computing systems. Accurate future predictions based on tensor-based multivariate Markov models can vigorously support enterprise decisions. However, the computation efficiency and quick response of tensor-based multimodal prediction approach are seriously restricted by the curse of dimensionality arising from high-order tensor. Therefore, to alleviate the problem, this paper focuses on proposing a tensor-train (TT)-based computation approach with its scalable implementation for high-order dominant eigen decomposition (HODED) in multivariate Markov models. First, we present a TT-based Einstein product directly based on decomposed TT cores and guarantee that the result remains TT format. Then, we put forward a scalable implementation for TT-based Einstein product in a distributed or parallel manner. Afterwards, we propose a scalable TT-based HODED (TT-HODED) algorithm and a multimodal accurate prediction algorithm. Furthermore, a TT-based big data processing and services framework is presented to provide accurate proactive services. Experimental results based on real-world GPS trajectory dataset demonstrate that TT-HODED algorithm can significantly improve the computation efficiency and reduce the running memory on the premise of guaranteeing the almost consistent prediction accuracy compared to the original HODED algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Engineering ManagementSame topicTensor decomposition and applicationsFrench-language works237,207