MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vector Space of Feynman Integrals and Multivariate Intersection Numbers

2019· article· en· W2954735736 on OpenAlexafffund
Hjalte Frellesvig, Federico Gasparotto, Manoj K. Mandal, Pierpaolo Mastrolia, Luca Mattiazzi, Sebastian Mizera

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeEuropean CommissionOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationGovernment of CanadaMainz Institute for Theoretical Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsFeynman integralScalar (mathematics)Feynman diagramIntersection (aeronautics)Path integral formulationVolume integralSlater integralsMathematicsFunctional integrationVector spaceOrder of integration (calculus)Pure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMathematical physicsApplied mathematicsIntegral equationMathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanicsQuantum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feynman integrals obey linear relations governed by intersection numbers, which act as scalar products between vector spaces. We present a general algorithm for the construction of multivariate intersection numbers relevant to Feynman integrals, and show for the first time how they can be used to solve the problem of integral reduction to a basis of master integrals by projections, and to directly derive functional equations fulfilled by the latter. We apply it to the decomposition of a few Feynman integrals at one and two loops, as first steps toward potential applications to generic multiloop integrals. The proposed method can be more generally employed for the derivation of contiguity relations for special functions admitting multifold integral representations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations156
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicPolynomial and algebraic computationFrench-language works237,207