Design and Analysis of Area and Power Efficient Approximate Booth Multipliers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Approximate computing is an emerging technique in which power-efficient circuits are designed with reduced complexity in exchange for some loss in accuracy. Such circuits are suitable for applications in which high accuracy is not a strict requirement. Radix-4 modified Booth encoding is a popular multiplication algorithm which reduces the size of the partial product array by half. In this paper, three Approximate Booth Multiplier Models (ABM-M1, ABM-M2, and ABM-M3) are proposed in which approximate computing is applied to the radix-4 modified Booth algorithm. Each of the three designs features a unique approximation technique that involves both reducing the logic complexity of the Booth partial product generator and modifying the method of partial product accumulation. The proposed approximate multipliers are demonstrated to have better performance than existing approximate Booth multipliers in terms of accuracy and power. Compared to the exact Booth multiplier, ABM-M1 achieves up to a 23 percent reduction in area and 15 percent reduction in power with a Mean Relative Error Distance (MRED) value of 7:9 × 10-4. ABM-M2 has area and power savings of up to 51 and 46 percent respectively with a MRED of 2:7 × 10-2. ABM-M3 has area savings of up to 56 percent and power savings of up to 46 percent with a MRED of 3:4 × 10-3. The proposed designs are compared with the state-of-the-art existing multipliers and are found to outperform them in terms of area and power savings while maintaining high accuracy. The performance of the proposed designs are demonstrated using image transformation, matrix multiplication, and Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filtering applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".