Chronotropic incompetence as a risk predictor in children and young adults with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Risk stratification tools for catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) are limited. The exercise stress test (EST) is the most important diagnostic and prognostic test. We aimed to determine whether heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) response during EST were associated with the risk of arrhythmias. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the association between HR and BP response and ventricular arrhythmia burden on EST in 20 CPVT patients. HR reserve values <80% and ≤62% were used to define chronotropic incompetence (CI) off and on therapy, respectively. Symptoms and ventricular arrhythmia score (VAS) in all patients with respect to CI and BP during index EST off therapy and on maximal therapy were compared. RESULTS: CI in CPVT patients off therapy was associated with a worse VAS during EST (P = .046). Patients with CI also more frequently presented with syncope and/or cardiac arrest compared to patients with a normal chronotropic response (P = .008). Once on therapy, patients with CI had similar VAS compared to patients without CI (P = .50), suggesting that treatment attenuates risk related to CI. Patients with CI also had a lower peak systolic BP (P = .041) which persisted on maximal therapy (P = .033). CONCLUSION: Untreated CPVT patients with CI have more ventricular arrhythmias than those without CI. This may serve as a simple disease prognosticator that can be modified by antiarrhythmic therapy. A mechanistic link between CI and arrhythmia susceptibility remains unknown. Larger studies are needed to confirm and establish the mechanism of these findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".