The yeast proteases Ddi1 and Wss1 are both involved in the DNA replication stress response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genome integrity and cell survival are dependent on proper replication stress response. Multiple repair pathways addressing obstacles generated by replication stress arose during evolution, and a detailed understanding of these processes is crucial for treatment of numerous human diseases. Here, we investigated the strong negative genetic interaction between two proteases involved in the DNA replication stress response, yeast Wss1 and Ddi1. While Wss1 proteolytically acts on DNA-protein crosslinks, mammalian DDI1 and DDI2 proteins remove RTF2 from stalled forks via a proposed proteasome shuttle hypothesis. We show that the double-deleted Δddi1, Δwss1 yeast strain is hypersensitive to the replication drug hydroxyurea and that this phenotype can be complemented only by catalytically competent Ddi1 protease. Furthermore, our data show the key involvement of the helical domain preceding the Ddi1 protease domain in response to replication stress caused by hydroxyurea, offering the first suggestion of this domain's biological function. Overall, our study provides a basis for a novel dual protease-based mechanism enabling yeast cells to counteract DNA replication stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".