Thermal processing strategies enabling boride dissolution and gamma prime precipitation in dissimilar nickel-based superalloys transient liquid phase bond
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The microstructure of dissimilar transient liquid phase bond between Hastelloy X and IN792 nickel-based superalloys is featured by lack of sufficient formation of γ′ precipitates in the bond-centerline and extensive in-situ precipitation of boride second phases in the diffusion affected zones (DAZ). This paper investigates the impact of two thermal processing strategies, using standard solution treatment and aging of IN792 (STA strategy) and using solution treatment of IN792 followed by a post-bond heat treatment utilizing solution treatment of Hastelloy X and aging treatment of IN792 (SPTA strategy) on the joint microstructure and mechanical properties. The boride precipitates in the DAZ of Hastelloy X showed higher resistance to dissolution rather than those in IN792 which can be attributed to the higher content of the boride former elements in Hastelloy X. Both thermal processing routs resulted in the formation of γ′ strengthened bonds with overmatched hardness compared to the Hastelloy X. However, STPA strategy enabled complete dissolution of borides in DAZ of IN792, significant dissolution of borides in DAZ of Hastelloy X, and development of bimodal γ′ distribution in the IN792 base material. Nevertheless, the grain growth in the Hastelloy X after STPA strategy limits the achievable joint shear strength.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it