MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2954879303 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10501000.1

Future Sea-Ice Decline Predicted to Bring the Arctic Nations Closer Together

2019· preprint· en· W2954879303 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia DeRepentigny, Bruno Tremblay, R. Newton, Stephanie Pfirman, Alexandra Jahn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceArctic ice packArcticClimatologyEnvironmental scienceSnowCryosphereFuture sea levelGeographyDrift iceOceanographyGeologyMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decades, Arctic sea ice has declined in thickness and extent and is shifting towards a seasonal ice regime, with accelerated ice drift and an increase in the seasonal ice zone. The changing Arctic ice cover will impact the trans-border exchange of sea ice between the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of the Arctic nations, with important implications for ice-rafted contaminant transport. To investigate projected changes to transnational ice exchange, we use the Lagrangian Ice Tracking System (LITS) to follow ice floes from the location of their formation to where they ultimately melt. We apply this tool to output from two ensembles of the Community Earth System Model (CESM): the CESM Large Ensemble, which uses a high emission scenario (RCP8.5) that leads to over 4°C global warming by 2100, and the CESM Low Warming ensemble, with reduced emissions that lead to a stabilized warming of 2°C by 2060. We also use the National Snow and Ice Data Center Polar Pathfinder and Climate Data Record products to evaluate the fidelity of the CESM present-day tracking simulations. Transnational ice exchange is well represented in CESM except for ice traveling from Russia to Norway, with twice as much ice following this pathway compared to observations. Initial results suggest this might be due to a combination of internal variability and speed biases in the observational data. The CESM projects that by mid-century, transnational ice exchange will expand, with a large increase in the fraction of transnational ice originating from Russia and the Central Arctic. As the seasonal ice zone grows, ice floes accelerate and transit times decrease, eventually cutting off ice exchange between longer pathways. By the end of the 21st century, we see a large impact of the emission scenario on ice exchange: consistent ice-free summers under the high emission scenario act to reduce the total fraction of transnational ice exchange compared to mid-century. The low emission scenario on the other hand continues to see an increase in transnational ice exchange by 2100. Under both scenarios, all pathways have decreased to average transit times of less than 2 years, compared to a maximum of 6 years under present-day conditions and 3 years by mid-century, effectively bringing the Arctic nations closer together.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→