Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les mémoires du rabbin Pinchas Hirschprung, parus à Montréal à la fin de 1944, soulèvent plusieurs enjeux littéraires intéressants que l’auteur de cet article aborde dans le contexte de la vie culturelle yiddish au Canada. Quand Hirschprung arrive dans la ville, à la fin de 1941, il n’est guère prédisposé à s’intéresser de près au courant séculier dominant au sein des lettres juives contemporaines. Talmudiste de renom et pratiquant orthodoxe, il n’a pas été préparé par sa formation strictement religieuse à interagir avec les journalistes politiques et les poètes modernistes qui occupent les postes de commande au sein du journal yiddish de Montréal, le Keneder Adler. Malgré cela, il ne tarde pas à être invité à prendre la plume dans ce quotidien et, à la fin de 1942, il publie les premiers chapitres de son futur ouvrage Fun natsishen yomertol: zikhroynes fun a polit dans les pages de l’Adler. Comment s’est établi ce rapport entre le rabbin Hirschprung et ses nouveaux collègues, et quelle signification faut-il tirer de cette rencontre pour l’évolution des lettres yiddish de Montréal?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".