Pathways to Reconciliation: the Kitcisakik Land-Based Education Initiative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Grounded in settler colonialism and resurgence, this paper presents multiple accounts gleaned from students who underwent experiential ways of learning about Indigenous cultures and sociopolitical issues through a land-based education experience considered as a contribution to building reconciliation. For over 8 years, the semi-nomadic community of Kitcisakik in Western Québec has received non-Indigenous students to experience living ‘off the land’ and share Anicinape ways. Originally inspired by a community desire to share and transmit Anicinape culture while re-appropriating wider territories of their ‘occupied’ ancestral land, this became a grassroots social economy initiative, offering 4- to 10- day educational trips for students. In addition to encouraging cultural dialogue and mutual respect, the initiative exemplifies the benefits of Indigenous learning pedagogies that are both experiential and land-based. Students describe how they physically and spiritually encounter Indigenous resilience via a confrontation of the neocolonial intricacies evident in contemporary Canada. Such critical self-reflection is necessary in Canada’s nascent era of decolonization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".