DOZ047.01: Risk factors for anastomotic strictures in the first year after esophageal atresia repair: data from a prospective multicentric cohort
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objectives and study Anastomotic stricture (AS) is a frequent complication of the surgery for œsophageal atresia (OA) during the first year of life. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of AS before 1 year old in infants with type A and C OA who were operated on. Secondary objectives were to determine risk factors for AS in OA, for recurrent and refractory AS, and to establish if AS is associated with antireflux surgery. Methods A prospective national multicentric study was conducted including all infants born with OA between 2008 and 2015. Patients deceased before one year old, OA types B and E, and patients for whom data about AS were missing were excluded from the study. Data were collected at birth and at 12 months of age. Anastomosis under tension was defined by the surgeon and a delayed anastomosis was defined by an anastomosis after 15 days of life. Recurrent stricture was defined by the need of ≥3 dilations and refractory stricture was defined by the need of ≥5 dilations. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were conducted. Results Of the 1258 eligible patients (84%), 1054 were included in the study from 38 centers. The prevalence of AS in the first year of life was 23.3% [20.7–28.9]. Anastomosis under tension (AUT) and delayed anastomosis (DA) were found to be independent risk factors for AS (respectively 2.5 [1.73–3.45] and 3.7 [1.95–7.2] (OR [CL 95%])) in the total population. Neither sex, birth weight, prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation, associated malformations, type A OA, nor the type of surgical approach was a risk factor for AS. In type C OA, DA was the only risk factor for AS (OR: 3.1 [1.65–5.86]). The group with AS had 2.5-fold more fundoplication compared to the patients without AS (P = 0.0005) in the total population and in type C OA. AUT and DA were found to be independent risk factors for recurrent stricture (OR: 2.4 [1.47–3.9] and 4.7 [2.2–10.4], respectively) and DA was the only risk factor for refractory stricture (OR: 6.23 [2.4–16.2]). Conclusion Surgical factors at the time of first repair of OA are the only risk factors for AS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".