MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955034569 · doi:10.5430/wje.v9n3p22

A Case Study of Teacher Engagement in Partisan Politics and It’s Influences on Students Learning and Classroom Practices: Perspective on Bangladesh

2019· article· en· W2955034569 on OpenAlex
Mohammad Omar Shiddike

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Education · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndonesian Election Politics and Participation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsPerspective (graphical)Affect (linguistics)PedagogyQualitative researchProfessional developmentPsychologyMathematics educationSociologyPolitical scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main purpose of this study is to uncover the various ways in which teacher engagement in partisan politics goesahead to influence the delivery of the teacher in the classroom as well as the learning of the students in highereducation institutions in Bangladesh. The sole approach to the study focuses on two higher education institutions inBangladesh as the study focused on how teacher engagement in partisan politics goes ahead to affect the learning ofthe students as well as the professional output of the teachers. Through the framework provided by the literaturereview, the qualitative study went ahead to explore both individuals as well as collective opinions which went toshow that indeed partisan politics did indeed affect the professional duties of the teachers leading to implications tothe students as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it