Recovery of glutamatergic and GABAergic protein expression in visual cortex after monocular deprivation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A collection of glutamatergic and GABAergic proteins participate in regulating experience-dependent plasticity in the visual cortex (V1). Many studies have characterized changes to those proteins caused by monocular deprivation (MD) during the critical period (CP), but less is known about changes that occur when MD stops. We measured the effects of 3 types of visual experience after MD (n=24, 10 male and 14 female); reverse occlusion (RO), binocular deprivation (BD), or binocular vision, on the expression of synaptic proteins in V1 including glutamatergic and GABAergic receptor subunits. Synapsin expression was increased by RO but not affected by the other treatments. BD shifted the balance between glutamatergic and GABAergic receptor subunits to favor GABA A α1. In contrast, BV shifted expression to favor the glutamatergic mechanisms by increasing NMDAR and decreasing GABA A α1 subunits. None of the conditions returned normal expression levels to all of the proteins, but BV was the closest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".