MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955041246 · doi:10.4000/alsic.3618

Apprentissage des langues sur Internet : articuler ressources open source et outils grand public pour produire des services robustes à la massification

2019· article· fr· W2955041246 on OpenAlexaff
Matthieu Cisel

Bibliographic record

VenueAlsic · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Language Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceSociologyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le domaine de l'apprentissage des langues en ligne, la massification des publics – nous parlons ici de services s'adressant à plusieurs centaines de milliers, voire plusieurs millions d'individus – semble avoir été, jusqu'à présent, l'apanage d'entreprises privées. Nous avançons ici l'idée selon laquelle la multiplication de certains formats de ressources éducatives libres (REL) produites par crowdsourcing pourrait faciliter considérablement la conception de parcours d'apprentissage anal...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0120.016
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlsicSame topicFrench Language Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207