MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955044340 · doi:10.36342/teika.v8i1.867

Sistem Pencatatan Laporan Tanam Dan Hasil Panen Menggunakan Sms Gateway Di Wilayah Kabupaten Bandung Barat

2018· article· id· W2955044340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTeIKa Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi · 2018
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation Retrieval and Data Mining
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOperating systemHorticultureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tujuan membangun Sistem Pencatatan Laproan Tanam dan Hasil Panen Menggunakan SMS Gateway adalah sebagai alat pendukung untuk mengirimkan informasi kepada petani dengan efisien dan cepat. Teknologi Informasi yang digunakan dalam membangun Aplikasi SMS Gateway untuk Sistem Pencatatan Laporan Tanam dan Hasil Panen di Dinas Pertanian berbasis PHP dan menggunakan Gammu sebagai antarmuka yang menghubungkan handphone atau modem dengan komputer. Sebagai Metode Penelitian digunakan Metode SDLC. Sistem ini menggunakan modem dan Handphone sebagai media pengiriman dan penerima pesan masuk. Sistem ini dibangun dengan cara mengkonfigurasikan gammu agar dapat bekerja dengan baik, membuat sistem yang mampu membalas sms registrasi dan informasi dengan auto replay. Dari hasil penelitian dan pengujian yang telah dilaksanakan, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa Gammu dapat dikonfigurasikan dengan modem dan database melalui device manager. Sistem ini bisa mendeteksi pesan masuk pada inbox yang dikirim oleh petani dan bisa mengirimkan balasan sesuai dengan kebutuhan petani.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.010
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it