Echoes of the Brazilian Nationalism Movement in Four Works for Viola and Piano (1950-82)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The requirements for this thesis consist of three parts: a recording of four works for viola and piano by Brazilian composers, which includes: M. Camargo Guarnieri’s Sonata (1950), Francisco Mignone’s Três Valsas Brasileiras (1968), Radamés Gnattali’s Sonata (1969), and Cláudio Santoro’s Sonata No. 2 (1982), a CD liner notes to accompany this recording, and a final solo recital with the performance of these four works. The recording was produced in February and March, 2018 at the University of Alberta’s Convocation Hall on a Hamburg Steinway Model D-274 concert grand piano with pianist Janet Scott Hoyt. The recital was presented at the same venue on June 11, 2018. The essay introduces individual analyses of these four works exploring elements from the Brazilian nationalism movement in the development of the repertoire for viola and piano. This study also examines the importance of violists Perez Dworecki (1920-2011), George Kiszely (1930-2010), and Johannes Oelsner (1915-2009) in the growth of the instrument (viola) in Brazil. Listen to the recording here - https://ualberta.aviaryplatform.com/r/vx05x26p8x
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".