Les dilemmes du métier des accompagnants des élèves à besoins éducatifs particuliers dans les écoles inclusives au Liban
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La réalité sociale, culturelle et économique dans les écoles au Liban semble contribuer à la croissance des inégalités, qui devraient guider le nécessaire « changement de paradigme » que nécessite l’école inclusive. Notre intérêt porte sur l’étude du vécu des accompagnants scolaires des élèves à besoins éducatifs particuliers dans ces écoles inclusives. L'objectif de cette recherche est de retenir les dilemmes du métier (Jorro, 2002) de ces professionnels. La méthodologie adoptée est celle de l'analyse de l'activité des pratiques (Clot, Faïta, Fernandez et Scheller, 2001). Nos résultats font apparaître quatre dilemmes du métier portant sur l’identité professionnelle de ces intervenants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".